The categorical imperative would be that which represented an action as necessary of itself without reference to another end, i.e. The former represent the practical necessity of a possible action as means to something else that is willed (or at least which one might possibly will). ![]() Now all imperatives command either hypothetically or categorically. ![]() Therefore imperatives are only formulae to express the relation of objective laws of all volition to the subjective imperfection of the will of this or that rational being, e.g. Therefore no imperatives hold for the Divine will, or in general for a holy will ought is here out of place, because the volition is already of itself necessarily in unison with the law. It is distinguished from the pleasant, as that which influences the will only by means of sensation from merely subjective causes, valid only for the sense of this or that one, and not as a principle of reason, which holds for every one.Ī perfectly good will would therefore be equally subject to objective laws (viz., laws of good), but could not be conceived as obliged thereby to act lawfully, because of itself from its subjective constitution it can only be determined by the conception of good. ![]() That is practically good, however, which determines the will by means of the conceptions of reason, and consequently not from subjective causes, but objectively, that is on principles which are valid for every rational being as such. They say that something would be good to do or to forbear, but they say it to a will which does not always do a thing because it is conceived to be good to do it. The conception of an objective principle, in so far as it is obligatory for a will, is called a command (of reason), and the formula of the command is called an Imperative.Īll imperatives are expressed by the word ought, and thereby indicate the relation of an objective law of reason to a will, which from its subjective constitution is not necessarily determined by it (an obligation). But if reason of itself does not sufficiently determine the will, if the latter is subject also to subjective conditions (particular impulses) which do not always coincide with the objective conditions in a word, if the will does not in itself completely accord with reason (which is actually the case with men), then the actions which objectively are recognised as necessary are subjectively contingent, and the determination of such a will according to objective laws is obligation, that is to say, the relation of the objective laws to a will that is not thoroughly good is conceived as the determination of the will of a rational being by principles of reason, but which the will from its nature does not of necessity follow. , the will is a faculty to choose that only which reason independent of inclination recognises as practically necessary, i.e. ![]() If reason infallibly determines the will, then the actions of such a being which are recognised as objectively necessary are subjectively necessary also, i.e. Since the deduction of actions from principles requires reason, the will is nothing but practical reason. Rational beings alone have the faculty of acting according to the conception of laws, that is according to principles, i.e. Everything in nature works according to laws.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |